Ordinary hops compound into administrative control. No single hop looks dangerous.
Find the paths that matter. Drive the fix. Prove the risk is gone.
Unizo connects your security signals into Live Security Context, reasons over what can actually reach what matters, drafts the remediation plan, and verifies the exposure is closed. Agentic where it helps. Bounded where it matters.
You don't have a findings problem. You have a reduction problem.
Your team closes tickets, meets SLAs, and works the queue. None of it tells you whether the environment is harder to attack than it was last quarter.
Every tool is confident, and none of them talk
Each produces its own ranked list, and not one knows that a finding sits one hop from a privileged cloud role.
A score describes a vulnerability, not your environment
It cannot see that a medium-rated finding sits directly upstream of your most sensitive system.
A closed ticket is an activity record
It says someone did something. It does not say the exposure path is broken.
Ranking a list higher is not the same as reducing it.
Every tool sees a piece. Unizo sees the path.
Same CVE. Same score. One of them reaches your customer database.
On its own, each is one row in a report of thousands. Unizo connects the asset to the identity, the identity to the role, the role to the impact, then drives the fix and re-checks the condition.
Signals in. Verified reduction out.
Connect
the signals you already collect
Model
into one live picture of your environment
Reason
over the routes that can actually reach what matters
Focus
on the changes that disrupt them
Drive
the fix to the owner who can make it
Verify
the exposure is gone, and produce the evidence
It never stops running, and the recurring work runs with it. That's the only way risk actually moves.
Not one plan. The right plan.
Unizo's AI exposure analyst does the investigation you would do with ten more analysts and forty more hours. Agentic where it helps. Bounded where it matters.
A canonical fix closes the vulnerability. A compensating control can close the path, and sometimes several at once. Unizo drafts more than one way to close the exposure, shows what each is likely to reduce, and lets you choose.
It drafts. You approve. Nothing touches production until you do.
Exposure paths take shapes. Unizo learns yours.
Most paths fall into a few recognisable forms. These are four we see constantly. The model finds the ones we haven't named yet.
Build-time reaches run-time. Two worlds that were never supposed to touch.
Many paths, one identity. Fix the identity, disrupt several at once.
Not the route. The thing at the end of it, and whether anything can get there.
✓ Every shape runs the same arc: verify the finding is real, reason over what it can reach, open an investigation, draft the plan, drive it to the owner, and confirm the path is gone.
Remediation isn't done when the ticket closes. It's done when the path is gone.
Unizo re-checks the exposure condition itself. Whether the identity gap closed. Whether the seed was removed. Whether the path is still reachable. That is verified closure, and it produces the evidence.
"We fixed it" becomes something you can show.
The teams doing the reduction.
No rip-and-replace. Unizo runs on the stack you already have.
Unizo doesn't replace your tools or become another system to migrate onto. It connects them into one live view your team can reason over. The reach is broad; the commitment is light.
The categories matter more than the logos. If a system knows something about your assets, identities, access, or ownership, Unizo is built to read it.
No booth.
No slides.
Come argue
with us.
We're off the show floor and in the room with you: a real exposure path, traced end to end in thirty minutes, founder-led. Bring your hardest question about why your last remediation didn't reduce anything.